Corporate employee traveler tracking should be near the top of every global travel managers list. According to statistics, “71 percent track travelers using TMC itinerary data, 30 percent use credit card data, and 12 percent use GPS via tools that tap into travelers’ mobile devices”, and it should be noted that 17 percent aren’t tracking at all. Many corporations”still take a passive approach” to tracking employees. Unfortunately, in the last year, we’ve seen a number of crises and many other events that put travelers in danger. With a rise in crises, out-dated tracking “can be problematic especially in an emergency situation when plans tend to change,” and employees are in unfamiliar territory. In JoAnn DeLuna’s article discover tracking supplements, mobile tools, and other ways to increase tracking efforts.

Read the full article here.

47% believe their company is entirely responsible for their well-being while on a business trip.

That means providing travelers with safe transportation, lodging and access to support. It also means understanding where they are and being able to communicate with and assist them in a crisis. Forty-five percent of male travelers and 47 percent of female travelers pegged their employers with complete responsibility for their well-being while on a business trip. Thirty-three percent of males and 41 percent of females relied on their companies to be very responsible, and 18 percent of males and 10 percent of females felt they shared equal responsibility with employers. Below that level, percentages for both groups were small.

Slicing the data by travel frequency brought starker differences to the surface. Travelers hitting the road 12 or more times a year levied much more responsibility on their companies. More than 64 percent of frequent travelers said their company was entirely responsible for their well-being, and 29 percent said the company was “very responsible.”

94% would opt in for GPS tracking of their mobile device if traveling to a high-risk market.

Defining a high-risk market has become increasingly difficult, but where travelers perceive an increased risk, the vast majority would sign up for GPS tracking of their whereabouts. The result is curious, given the fact that 20 percent of respondents cited GPS tracking as “not appropriate” in general, even in high-risk markets. GPS tracking may seem invasive in concept, but the option becomes more attractive put into the context of a specific trip.

Given their declared reliance on their companies for their well-being, frequent travelers were the least squeamish about all suggested traveler-tracking strategies. Two-thirds said GPS tracking was fine for “all trips,” compared with just 45 percent of total respondents. Two-thirds of all respondents were comfortable with employers mining itinerary data for all trips; compare that with more than three-quarters of frequent travelers who assume their employer should be scanning itinerary data for all trips. Nearly all respondents were comfortable with drilling into itineraries for high-risk trips.

Overall numbers were similar for monitoring credit card data for the last place the traveler charged an expense; 69 percent were open to those queries. Frequent travelers fell in line with the group on this count.

49% of travelers feel less safe on business trips than they did 12 months ago.

Terror attacks, social unrest, refugee crises and downed flights filled headlines over the past 12 months. While business travel industry associations reported little market effect on trip volume, BTN’s survey showed a psychic toll on business travelers. All groups reported similar heightened concern, but female business travelers changed the most; 54 percent feel less secure now, compared with 46 percent of males and 47 percent of frequent travelers (among the survey’s sample of frequent travelers, nearly two-thirds were male).