Hazardous Occupations – Sorry, No Can Do.
Federal law strictly prohibits the employment of minors in non-agricultural work falling within any of the USDOL’s list of hazardous occupations. These occupations include, but are not limited to, manufacturing or storing explosives, driving a motor vehicle, work as an outside helper on motor vehicles, coal mining, firefighting, power-driven tools, exposure to radioactive substances, and many more. According to recent reports, the USDOL might relax these restrictions; however, creating and implementing these changes will take time. For at least this year, employers should assume the status quo.
Restrictions Based on Age – Uh, Let Me Get My Matrix.
The good news is that, while the hazardous occupations can be tedious to evaluate sometimes, these are the only federal child labor restrictions that apply to 16- and 17- year olds. At the other end of the spectrum, the analysis can be simpler because anyone under age 14 can do little more than babysit on a casual basis. The options expand for minors 14- or 15- years old though.
Children that are 14- and 15-years of age generally can perform tasks such as office and clerical work, intellectual or artistically-creative work, cashiering, and stocking shelves. They also can perform limited food service work, maintenance work (buildings or grounds), and, in some instances, lifeguarding, running errands, and washing vehicles, among other things. Even so, for this group employers must be mindful not just of the type of work, but of the hours.
For example, federal law only allows the employment of 14- and 15- year olds in non-agricultural work pursuant to specific total-hour and time-of-day restrictions. These can be difficult to apply given that school sessions vary widely, including that some cross into the summer months or go “year round”. At bottom, the main factor when it comes to scheduling work will be whether the particular day is a school day. For big picture purposes (such as hiring), however, it is often best to begin with whether the local public school will be out of session for the relevant workweeks.

Best Practices
Beefing up your staff for the summer season is a welcomed relief for many employers. Additionally, summer jobs expose youth to tangible skills that foster independence and the ability to gain valuable work experience. Nevertheless, before hiring minors, consider all that you’ve read. The FLSA’s child labor restrictions are heavily enforced and management bears the burden of abiding by these rules. So, before diving into the deep end of summer recruitment, employers should consider the following tips:
Get and preserve a USDOL-sanctioned age certificate. If you hire an individual who turns out to be younger than you thought, the USDOL will not be influenced by the fact that the worker “looked” older or that you were misled about the worker’s age. To avoid misjudging a minor’s age and violating the child-labor regulations, obtain a qualifying age certificate even if not required (state law).
Clearly outline the job duties associated with vacant summer-job occupations. Do not rely on a job title when determining if an occupation includes prohibited work. Dig deeper and consider the actual job duties. Many times employers mistakenly assume a role is permitted based on its title when, in actuality, the activities carried out in this position are prohibited. Carefully review both the permitted and prohibited work, especially before hiring an individual under 16 years of age.
Inform employees of the specific tasks each minor-worker should not perform. Train management on what tasks can and cannot be assigned to minor-workers. Memorialize this training by distributing a memorandum clearly indicating the child labor limitations for each minor-employee. Consider also informing other employees who will interact with the minor, and perhaps even the minor.
Ensure each youth-employee is properly supervised. Be attentive when employing minors. One suggestion is to implement a mentor/mentee system where a seasoned worker is assigned a minor-employee to supervise. This can assist management with alleviating the task of micro-managing your summer staff.
The Bottom Line
This is only a general summary of the FLSA’s child labor restrictions and, because of more restrictive state laws, federal law might only be the tip of the iceberg. At a minimum, an employer should review its hiring and employment practices with respect to minors, and implement a process to ensure compliance with the FLSA and any other applicable state laws. Should you have additional questions, contact your Fisher Phillips attorney.
]]>Use of the E-Verify system is currently voluntary for employers unless mandated under state or local law, or if you are obligated as a federal contractor under an existing federal contract. However, Congress is considering legislation to mandate E-Verify for all employers, require a status check of all current employees not electronically verified within the three preceding years, and require termination of all employees determined unauthorized to work. Expect to see a healthy discussion on this topic in the months to come, and don’t be surprised if you are required to use E-Verify before you know it.
Before this much-anticipated debate kicks into high gear, employers should know that balancing the use of E-Verify while avoiding the implications of employment discrimination can prove to be as simple as walking a tightrope. But fear not! Here is a crash course on what you need to know about E-Verify.
The Basics: Mount The Line
The federal government’s web-based system known as E-Verify compares information from an individual’s Form I-9 against data in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Social Security Administration (SSA), and Department of State (DOS) records to confirm employment eligibility. An employer uses the information from the I-9 to create a case in the E-Verify system, to commence no later than three business days after the start of employment. After the case is created, the system provides a case verification number, and employers must either record that number on the I-9 or attach the case detail page to the document itself.
After inputting the information, E-Verify immediately responds with an initial case result of either “Employment Authorized” or “Tentative Nonconfirmation” (TNC), indicating whether the information on the I-9 matches the available records. Current statistics show that 97 percent of individuals who are checked through E-Verify are Employment Authorized, meaning the information entered into the system matches the information in the federal agency databases. The individual is thus considered authorized to work and the employer closes the E-Verify case.
However, when the information provided by the employee and inputted into the system does not match with DHS, SSA, or DOS databases, employers will receive a TNC notification. The employer must promptly inform the employee in private, and provide a “Further Action Notice” document for the employee to sign explaining the reason for the TNC.
The employee may choose to contest the results, in which case the employer must issue a Referral Date Confirmation from E-Verify providing contact information and instructions for the employee to contact the DHS or SSA. The employee then has eight federal government work days after initiating the referral to contact the appropriate federal agency to resolve the matter. If the matter is resolved, and the SSA or DHS update their records to reflect a match and an Employment Authorized result, the employer may close the case. However, if the individual refuses to contest the TNC or if a Final Nonconfirmation (FNC) result is issued, the employer may terminate employment.
Lucky 13: Walking The Tightrope With A Safety Net
Misuse of the E-Verify system by an employer could lead to a charge of discrimination based on citizenship, immigration, or national origin. But if you use the system properly, you will receive the benefit of a safe harbor. To avoid any implication of E-Verify-related employment discrimination, you should consider the following 13 steps:
Careful, Don’t Slip!
While maintaining your balance, one misstep can result in a fall. In the event you slip up, the Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER) of the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division reviews charges of discrimination and investigates all alleged discriminatory conduct pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
If an employee suspects their employer is discriminating based on citizenship, immigration status, national origin, or other discriminatory misuse of the E-Verify system, the employee can notify IER. The agency will either contact the employer to resolve the issue or, when necessary, issue charge forms to victims of discrimination. Upon receipt of a charge of discrimination, IER takes approximately seven months to complete an investigation. Violators are subject to civil penalties, back pay awards, hiring orders, the imposition of injunctive relief to end discriminatory practices, and attorneys’ fee awards.
Dismount!
To maintain balance and avoid a tumble, you should adopt a written immigration compliance policy, train all staff on how to enforce it, and employ ongoing education of the E-Verify system. You should also consider taking advantage of the IER outreach and education programs to gain a firm understanding of the antidiscrimination provisions of the INA.
If the IER comes knocking, don’t panic. Instead, cooperate with the investigation, make the necessary adjustments, and know that you can always contact your local Fisher Phillips attorney for assistance. But you don’t need to wait until the government is on your doorstep to call upon our firm; we can assist you from your first step on the tightrope until you land safely on the other side.
For more information, contact the author at NBanks@fisherphillips.com or 404.240.5853.
]]>